EG
Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- ESNT delivered solid Q1 2025 results: Revenue $317.6M and diluted EPS $1.69, with YoY investment income tailwinds and strong portfolio persistency; EPS and revenue modestly beat S&P Global consensus, aided by higher net investment income and stable base premium rates . Q1 EPS $1.69 vs $1.65 in Q3’24 and $1.58 in Q4’24; Revenues $317.6M vs $316.6M in Q3’24 and $315.0M in Q4’24 . S&P Global consensus: EPS $1.649*, revenue $310.8M* (beat) (see Estimates Context).
- Credit trends remained benign within expectations: default rate fell to 2.19% from 2.27% in Q4, with provision for losses down sequentially to $31.3M from $41.0M in Q4; MI loss ratio improved to 13.1% from 16.3% .
- Capital and reinsurance positioning stay strong: PMIERs sufficiency ratio at 172%, ~$1.5B excess available assets; expanded reinsurance (forward quota share for 2025–2026; additional XOL deals effective July 1) and increased affiliate cession to 50% beginning Q2 (retro to Jan 1) support capital efficiency and risk transfer .
- Capital return/catalysts: Declared $0.31 dividend; repurchased 3.9M shares YTD through April 30 for ~$218M, with $429M remaining under the $500M program—management emphasized valuation-sensitive buybacks and balanced capital allocation, which are likely stock drivers near term .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Revenue and EPS beat S&P Global consensus; topline benefited from higher net investment income (+12% YoY to $58.2M) and stable premium yields; management cited “favorable credit performance, elevated portfolio persistency and higher investment income” .
- Credit remained within plan: default rate improved sequentially to 2.19% (from 2.27%), and MI loss ratio declined to 13.1% (from 16.3%); management expects defaults to remain in the 2–3% range and reminded that many defaults do not translate into claims due to HPA and cures .
- Capital strength and risk transfer: PMIERs sufficiency at 172% (~$1.5B excess); two forward quota share deals (25% of eligible 2025–2026 NIW) and two XOL transactions (effective July 1) plus increased affiliate quota share to 50% enhance flexibility and reduce mezzanine risk .
What Went Wrong
- NIW softer QoQ amid higher rates and constrained affordability: $9.95B vs $12.22B in Q4’24 (seasonality/rates), though up vs $8.32B in Q1’24 .
- Expense ratio ticked up: MI expense ratio rose to 18.7% (from 17.5% in Q4) as operating expenses increased; management guided MI other underwriting and operating expenses to $160–$165M for FY 2025 .
- Loss provision higher YoY: $31.3M vs $9.9M in Q1’24, reflecting seasoning, storm-related dynamics and portfolio mix; though sequentially lower than Q4’s $41.0M .
Financial Results
Summary Financials vs Prior Quarters and S&P Consensus
Notes: S&P Global consensus estimates marked with *. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Mortgage Insurance (MI) Margins
Segment Revenue Breakdown
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We continue to benefit from favorable credit performance, elevated portfolio persistency and higher investment income.” — Mark Casale, CEO .
- “Annualized investment yield for the first quarter was 3.8%... new money rates remained over 5%... a tailwind for investment income.” — CEO .
- “We entered into two forward quota share transactions... covering 25% of eligible policies in 2025 and 2026” and “two excess of loss transactions, effective July 1 of each year.” — Press release/CEO .
- “We decided to increase the ceding percentage of our affiliate quota share from 35% to 50%... effective in the second quarter and retroactive to NIW starting from January 1, 2025.” — CFO .
- “We repurchased nearly 4 million shares for over $200 million [YTD through April 30]... we are valuation-sensitive when it comes to buying back shares.” — CEO .
- “MI operating expenses... will be between $160 million and $165 million for the full year 2025.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Affordability cycle and geography: Management sees continued affordability constraints and elevated persistency; selectively raised pricing in certain markets to test elasticity; longer-term demand remains robust with first-time homebuyer age rising to 38 (pent-up demand) .
- Macro/tariffs and pricing: No broad pricing changes yet; through-the-cycle pricing framework maintained; will reassess if a macro “event” materializes .
- Credit outlook: Default rate expected in 2–3% range; many defaults do not result in claims due to cures/HPA; provisioning occurs at two missed payments but not all become paid claims .
- Capital return mechanics: $157M buybacks in Q1 and $61M in April; plan to maximize ordinary dividends from MI subs subject to credit; affiliate cession increases cash flow efficiency .
- Taxes: Incremental affiliate cession not expected to materially change 2025 ETR; Bermuda exemption through 2030, then 15% tax thereafter .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: EPS $1.69 actual vs $1.649* consensus (beat); Revenue $317.6M actual vs $310.8M* consensus (beat). Estimate counts: EPS (6), Revenue (5). Upcoming quarters: Q2 2025 EPS est $1.708*, revenue $318.2M* [GetEstimates].
Notes: S&P Global consensus values marked with *. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Modest EPS and revenue beats with sequential credit improvement (loss ratio down, default rate down) and persistent investment income tailwinds should support near-term sentiment .
- Reinsurance depth (forward QS/XOL) and higher affiliate cession enhance capital efficiency and reduce earnings volatility through mezzanine risk transfer; PMIERs excess remains sizable (172%, ~$1.5B) .
- Buyback cadence accelerated YTD (~$218M through April 30) with ample authorization remaining—valuation-sensitive repurchases can amplify BVPS/ROE compounding into a low-growth NIW backdrop .
- MI expense ratio rose; management guided MI OpEx to $160–$165M for 2025—watch operating leverage as NIW normalizes; base premium rate expected to hold near 41 bps in 2025 .
- Credit normalization remains the key watch item—management’s 2–3% default expectation and commentary that many defaults do not become claims reduces tail risk but seasonality/portfolio aging could keep provisions choppy .
- Strategic optionality (capital, potential industry consolidation, title option value) plus strong cash generation provide multiple levers for shareholder returns over the medium term .
Additional relevant press releases: ESNT added David Benson (ex-Fannie Mae) and April Galda Joyce to its Board on May 22, 2025, strengthening governance and housing/insurance expertise .